Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- project:wwwcccde:migration [17.09.2013 07:48] – [What warrants a tag?] ebrnd
+++ project:wwwcccde:migration [17.09.2013 07:59] (aktuell) – [Tagging (RFC)] ebrnd
@@ Zeile 104: / Zeile 104: @@
   * articles containing a link to a video should be tagged with "video".
     * what about pictures?
+      * Not 100% sure. The idea behind the "video" tag was that users who are reading using a cellphone (limited bandwidth, small screen) or can't use headphones or loudspeakers at the moment for some reason can skip over articles which require watching a video (which often relies on an audio track as well) to get the message across.
+      * I propose: Tag articles with images with "pic", and articles with videos with "video", if and only if the picture / video is the *main content* of the article. If the message is delivered using plain text, and the picutre / video is just a supplement, don't use the picture / video tag.